薈萃心理學(xué)各領(lǐng)域新進(jìn)展、新動(dòng)態(tài)
中心研究人員在《International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health》(SSCI-Q1; IF=4.614)上發(fā)表題為“Linking Self-Control to Negative Risk-Taking Behavior among Chinese Late Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model”的研究論文,揭示了自我控制對晚期青少年消極冒險(xiǎn)行為的影響機(jī)制。
01
青春期:冒險(xiǎn)行為的頂峰階段
基于此,本研究通過探討問題行為理論保護(hù)概念框架下的人格相關(guān)結(jié)構(gòu):自我控制、調(diào)節(jié)定向、一般權(quán)力感,尋找減少青少年消極冒險(xiǎn)行為的保護(hù)機(jī)制。
02
自我控制與消極冒險(xiǎn)行為
由此,本研究認(rèn)為更高的自我控制有助于減少或預(yù)防青少年的消極冒險(xiǎn)行為。
03
自我控制如何減少消極冒險(xiǎn)行為?
——調(diào)節(jié)定向的作用
自我控制的“促進(jìn)和預(yù)防機(jī)制”可以解釋自我控制與消極冒險(xiǎn)行為的關(guān)系(de Ridder et al., 2011; Li et al., 2019)。促進(jìn)機(jī)制是指調(diào)動(dòng)積極的思想、情緒和行為的過程,而預(yù)防機(jī)制是指解除消極的思想、情緒和行為的過程。
調(diào)節(jié)定向作為一種動(dòng)機(jī)取向,通過兩個(gè)獨(dú)立的動(dòng)機(jī)導(dǎo)向(即促進(jìn)定向和預(yù)防定向)在自我控制減少消極冒險(xiǎn)行為上發(fā)揮作用(Higgins, 2012)。其中,促進(jìn)定向是指利用接近策略來實(shí)現(xiàn)目標(biāo),而預(yù)防定向是指使用警惕和回避策略來實(shí)現(xiàn)目標(biāo)。
根據(jù)潛在的積極或消極結(jié)果,自我控制會(huì)增強(qiáng)不同的動(dòng)機(jī)取向以采取相應(yīng)的行為策略(Cheung et al., 2014; Ouyang et al., 2015)。由于消極冒險(xiǎn)行為可能會(huì)產(chǎn)生不確定的結(jié)果(Crone et al., 2016),因此,青少年的預(yù)防定向策略可能幫助他們防止自己產(chǎn)生不良后果。此外,由于期望獲得回報(bào)的潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn),他們的促進(jìn)定向策略也可能發(fā)揮作用??傊?,自我控制會(huì)間接通過促進(jìn)定向和預(yù)防定向影響青少年的消極冒險(xiǎn)行為。
04
自我控制何時(shí)減少消極冒險(xiǎn)行為?
——一般權(quán)力感的調(diào)節(jié)作用
05
研究概況
本研究以廣州市2018名本科生(759名男性,1259名女性)為研究對象,測量了被試的特質(zhì)自我控制、調(diào)節(jié)定向、一般權(quán)力感和消極冒險(xiǎn)行為等,并利用Mplus 8.3軟件檢驗(yàn)了自我控制對消極冒險(xiǎn)行為的直接影響,促進(jìn)定向和預(yù)防定向在二者間的中介效應(yīng)以及權(quán)力感的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)。
理論模型圖
06
結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)
1、高自我控制能減少消極冒險(xiǎn)行為
2、預(yù)防定向:自我控制降低消極冒險(xiǎn)行為的中介機(jī)制
3、權(quán)力感顯著增強(qiáng)了自我控制對預(yù)防定向的影響
另一個(gè)重要發(fā)現(xiàn)是,“自我控制-預(yù)防定向-消極冒險(xiǎn)行為”的中介效應(yīng)在權(quán)力感較高的青少年中作用更強(qiáng),即,高權(quán)力的青少年通過增加他們的預(yù)防動(dòng)機(jī)來接近其最終目標(biāo),以避免他們不想要的任何事情(Yang et al., 2017)。這是由于消極冒險(xiǎn)行為的潛在威脅遠(yuǎn)大于其積極收益,不僅消耗大量資源,而且在控制不當(dāng)?shù)那闆r下,會(huì)危害其身心健康(Crone et al., 2016)。因此,自我控制通過啟動(dòng)預(yù)防定向來抵制消極冒險(xiǎn)的誘惑(Scholer et al., 2010; Shao et al., 2018)。而具有高權(quán)力感會(huì)增強(qiáng)自我控制通過預(yù)防定向來實(shí)現(xiàn)目標(biāo)的動(dòng)機(jī)作用,從而保持其當(dāng)前的積極狀態(tài),防止新的消極狀態(tài)出現(xiàn),從而抑制消極冒險(xiǎn)行為的發(fā)生。
07
降低與預(yù)防
消極冒險(xiǎn)行為的教育路徑
(1)訓(xùn)練和培養(yǎng)青少年的自我控制能力,如正念訓(xùn)練等(Friese et al., 2012)。
(2)指導(dǎo)青少年設(shè)定目標(biāo),并鼓勵(lì)他們使用預(yù)防策略來維持現(xiàn)有的積極狀態(tài)和持續(xù)的努力(Petrou et al., 2020)。
(3)家長可以鼓勵(lì)青少年自己做決定,學(xué)??梢蕴峁└嗟恼n程和活動(dòng)來增強(qiáng)青少年的權(quán)力感,例如培訓(xùn)學(xué)生的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)技能以及提高社交和情感學(xué)習(xí)能力(Seemiller, 2018)。
基金資助
該文題為Linking Self-Control to Negative Risk-Taking Behavior among Chinese Late Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model,2022年6月22日在線發(fā)布于《International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health》(SSCI-Q1; IF=4.614)。第一作者是中心已畢業(yè)的16級碩士研究生梁梓勤(導(dǎo)師:聶衍剛教授),廣州大學(xué)竇凱副教授和聶衍剛教授為通訊作者,香港教育大學(xué)黎建斌博士和廣東輕工職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院王玉潔博士為共同作者。
該研究得到國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(No. 31800938;32071067)、 廣州市教育科學(xué)規(guī)劃2021年度重點(diǎn)課題(No. 202113700)和廣東省高校思政教育課題(No. 2021GXSZ139)的聯(lián)合資助。
想了解更多詳情,請點(diǎn)擊“查看原文”。
原文APA 7th引用格式:
Liang, Z. Q., Dou, K., Li, J. B., Wang, Y. J., & Nie, Y. G. (2022). Linking Self-Control to Negative Risk-Taking Behavior among Chinese Late Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7646. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7646
參考文獻(xiàn)
(請向上滑動(dòng)閱覽)
Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x.
Cheung, T. T. L., Gillebaart, M., Kroese, F., & De Ridder, D. (2014). Why are people with high self-control happier? The effect of trait self-control on happiness as mediated by regulatory focus.Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00722
Crone, E. A., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., & Peper, J. S. (2016). Annual research review: Neural contributions to risk-taking in adolescence – Developmental changes and individual differences.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12502
de Ridder, D. T. D., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418749
Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
Friese, M., Messner, C., & Schaffner, Y. (2012). Mindfulness meditation counteracts self-control depletion. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.008
Guinote, A. (2017). How power affects people: Activating, wanting, and goal seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153
Heller, S., Borsay, F., & Ullrich, J. (2017). Social power and dimensions of self-control: Does power benefit initiatory self-control but impair inhibitory self-control? Cogent Psychology, 4(1), 1288351. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1288351
Higgins, E. T. (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. Oxford University Press.
Jessor, R. (1991). Risk behavior in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Journal of Adolescent Health, 12(8), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/1054-139X(91)90007-K
Li, J. B., Dou, K., Situ, Q. M., Salcuni, S., Wang, Y. J., & Friese, M. (2019). Anger rumination partly accounts for the association between trait self-control and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.06.011
Ouyang, Y., Zhu, Y., Fan, W., Tan, Q.-B., & Zhong, Y.-P. (2015). People higher in self-control do not necessarily experience more happiness: Regulatory focus also affects subjective well-being.Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.044
Petrou, P., Baas, M., & Roskes, M. (2020). From prevention focus to adaptivity and creativity: The role of unfulfilled goals and work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1693366
Scholer, A. A., Zou, X., Fujita, K., Stroessner, S. J., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). When risk seeking becomes a motivational necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019715
Seemiller, C. (2018). A competency-based model for youth leadership development. Journal of leadership education, 17(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.12806/V17/I1/R1
Shao, P., Li, A., & Mawritz, M. (2018). Self‐protective reactions to peer abusive supervision: The moderating role of prevention focus and the mediating role of performance instrumentality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2206
Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010
van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Peters, S., Braams, B. R., & Crone, E. A. (2016). What motivates adolescents? Neural responses to rewards and their influence on adolescents' risk taking, learning, and cognitive control. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.037
Yang, W. Q., Li, Q., Guo, M. Y., Fan, Q., & He, Y. L. (2017). The effects of power on human behavior: The perspective of regulatory focus. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(3), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00404
推文作者:梁梓勤