Non-formal education refers to all organized educational programs that take place
outside the formal school system, and are usually short-term and voluntary. This includes
a wide variety of programs such as tennis courses, second language programs, driving
lessons, cooking classes, yoga classes, rehabilitation programs, painting courses, training
programs, workshops, etc. As in formal education, there are teachers (instructors,
facilitators) and a curriculum with various degrees of rigidity or flexibility. Unlike formal
education, these programs do not normally demand prerequisites in terms of previous
schooling. However, sometimes a diploma certifying competence or attendance is
granted. Non-formal education is usually directed to adults, but children and adolescents
may also participate in this sector (for instance, children going to Sunday school; boy-
scouts and girl-scouts programs, second language courses, music lessons during the
weekend, etc.).
Informal learning, then, takes place outside the curricula provided by formal and
non-formal educational institutions and programs. In the concept of ‘informal learning‘ it
is important to note that we are deliberately using the word ‘learning‘ and not ‘education‘,
because in the processes of informal learning there are not educational institutions,
institutionally authorized instructors or prescribed curricula. It is also pertinent to note
that we are saying ‘outside the curricula of educational institutions‘ and not ‘outside
educational institutions‘, because informal learning can also take place inside formal and
non-formal educational institutions. In that case, however, the learnings occur
independently (and sometimes against) the intended goals of the explicit curriculum.
Historically, the learning acquired through informal means has not been
recognized by formal educational institutions and by the workplace, although the recent
emergence of systems of evaluations and accreditation like PLAR may change this.
Interestingly, if non-formal education is defined as a residual category (anything
that is not formal education), informal learning becomes a residual category of a residual
category (anything that it is neither formal nor non-formal). However, it is in this sphere,
so disregarded and so under-researched, where most of the significant learnings that we
apply to our everyday lives are learned.
Still, as an analytical category, if we use the concept of informal learning without
distinguishing its internal forms, we may easily fall into conceptual confusion. The
concept of informal learning is useful but still is too broad, as it encompasses different
types of learnings which are usually conflated.
This leads to a question: is it possible to develop a taxonomy of informal
learning?
I suggest that by using two main categories (intentionality and consciousness), it
is possible to develop a taxonomy which identifies three forms (or types) of informal
learning: self-directed learning, incidental learning and socialization (Table 1).