作者: Jessi Hempel
時(shí)間: 2013年03月22日 來源:
財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)獲勝者：IBM
惠普（Hewlett-Packard，《財(cái)富》500強(qiáng)）對IBM的勝利來得并不輕松。2006年，惠普營收超過IBM，之后在這方面便一直保持領(lǐng)先。然而，營收并不是衡量成功的唯一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
在IT時(shí)代早期，兩家公司代表了兩個(gè)極端：惠普奠定了當(dāng)代硅谷濃厚的工程學(xué)氣質(zhì)。而IBM的標(biāo)志性人物湯姆斯?沃森則更像是一名銷售員，而不是一名科學(xué)家。
惠普在十年內(nèi)更換的CEO人數(shù)超過了IBM自結(jié)束沃森家族統(tǒng)治以來更換的CEO數(shù)量之和。IBM會(huì)制定五年發(fā)展計(jì)劃，而惠普則喜歡更為積極的舉措。
獲勝者：IBM
Hewlett-Packards' victory over IBM has not been particularly sweet. In 2006 it surpassed IBM in revenues, a lead it has maintained. But revenues are not the only measure of success.
Since the earliest days of IT, they have been polar opposites: HP seeded the engineering-heavy ethos of contemporary Silicon Valley. IBM's iconic Thomas Watson was more salesman than scientist.
HP (HPQ, Fortune 500) has had more CEOs in a decade than IBM (IBM, Fortune 500)has had since the end of the Watson family reign. IBM draws from five-year plans, while HP is fond of aggressive moves.
Winner:IBM
相關(guān)稿件
惠普和IBM：一個(gè)未來，兩條道路惠普當(dāng)初應(yīng)該聽首席財(cái)務(wù)官的話惠普可能被拆分，你相信嗎？惠普迷失記
本站僅提供存儲(chǔ)服務(wù)，所有內(nèi)容均由用戶發(fā)布，如發(fā)現(xiàn)有害或侵權(quán)內(nèi)容，請
點(diǎn)擊舉報(bào)。
